links · people · groups · tags | My: links · tags · groups · watchlists · notes login · sign up now! | help · blog
Simpy simpy
 
Bill Hooker, member since Jan 4, 2006
.
Search Everyone: "oa.numbers",

Top "oa.numbers" experts: sennoma,

1 - 47 of 47   Watch sennoma
 
misleading title -- actually a review of literature on whether OA articles are cited more than TA ones
by sennoma 2009-11-29 22:10 oa.numbers · oa · scientometics · bibliometrics
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2780014/?tool=pmcentrez&report=abstract - cached - mail it - history
Someone else who likes to have numbers to answer questions.
by sennoma 2009-10-20 03:09 oa.numbers · heathermorrison
http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com/2009/10/research-brief-library-savings-from.html - cached - mail it - history
Studies have shown that access to published health research by the research communities in developing countries is no longer “fit for purpose”.2 As has been well documented, rising costs of subscriptions and permission barriers imposed by publishers have barred access to the extent that local health research and health care have been damaged through lack of information.3,4 For example, Yamey5 tells of a physician in southern Africa who could not afford full access to journals but based a decision to alter a perinatal HIV prevention programme on one single abstract. The full text article would have shown that the findings were not relevant to the country’s situation. With the advent of the internet there is little justification for continuing to create barriers to access. Richard Smith, as the former editor of the British Medical Journal, said, “Most research is publicly funded, and when the internet appeared it made no sense for research funders to allow publishers to profit from restricting access to their research”.6 This is true not only for publicly funded research but for private health charities around the world. As the Open Access Policy of the Wellcome Trust states, “We . . . support unrestricted access to the published output of research as a fundamental part of its charitable mission and a public benefit to be encouraged wherever possible”.7 Science is a collaborative process and openness is fundamental to knowledge advancement.
by sennoma 2009-08-05 00:05 subbiaharunachalam · lesliechan · oa · WHO · mangosteen · oa.numbers
http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/87/8/09-064659/en/index.html - cached - mail it - history
Impaired access to research information in health-related fields is not solely the preserve of developing countries but it is hugely exacerbated in poorer regions of the world. While these regions bear the brunt of the world’s health problems, only 10% of health research effort goes into these areas (referred to as the “10/90 gap”).1 If we are going to achieve what the World Conference on Science held by UNESCO and the International Council for Science in 1999 termed the true “orienting of scientific progress towards meeting the needs of humankind”, then we must improve the research effort on the health problems that afflict the greatest part of the world’s population. That cannot happen until research communication is optimized: at the turn of the new millennium more than half of research-based institutions in lower-income countries had no current subscriptions at all to international research journals.2
by sennoma 2009-08-05 00:03 oa · almaswan · WHO · mangosteen · oa.numbers
http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/87/8/09-069237/en/index.html - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2009-07-27 01:18 oa.mandates · oa.numbers
http://www.nihms.nih.gov/stats/index.shtml - cached - mail it - history
In the months since passage of the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) mandatory public access policy in late December of 2007, the number of submissions to the National Library of Medicine’s (NLM) PubMed Central (PMC) repository, where authors are now required to deposit their NIH-funded research papers, has risen significantly. According to NIH statistics, submissions to PMC began steadily rising in December 2007, soon after it became clear a mandatory policy would be adopted in 2008. By the first month following passage of the new policy, January 2008, monthly submissions to PMC hit an all-time high of 1255, and have continued to increase significantly every month so far this year. In April 2008, when the policy officially took effect, submissions spiked even more sharply, rising from 1852 total submissions in March, to 2,765 in April and 2,593 in May. The April/May 2008 figures represent well over double the number of submissions for the same months in 2007 (1,198 PMC submissions in April ’07; 948 in May ’07). Although official figures for June have not yet been posted, the NIH’s Dr. David Lipman told the LJ Academic Newswire the submission totals were higher than May. It’s still too early to compute compliance rates, Lipman noted, but the early returns suggest a stunning turnaround. “Looking at the increase in submissions and the dramatic increase in journals signing PMC Publisher Participation agreements,” Lipman suggested a “reasonable projection” would be a compliance rate “around 55-60 percent.” Adoption of the “mandatory” NIH policy was spurred by abysmal compliance rates under the NIH’s first public access policy, adopted in 2005, which, after considerable pushback from publishers opposed to a deposit mandate, was scaled back to a voluntary policy at the 11th hour. In February, 2006, NIH reported to congress that compliance rates under the voluntary policy lagged around four percent. SPARC executive director Heather Joseph told the LJ Academic Newswire she expected PMC deposits to remain strong, a
by sennoma 2009-07-27 01:18 oa.mandates · oa.numbers
http://www.libraryjournal.com/info/CA6581624.html?nid=2673 - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2009-07-22 02:02 oa.numbers
http://www.rin.ac.uk/data-scholarly-journals - cached - mail it - history
In 2007-2008 a research team at Hanken developed an emperical method to measure the total amount of peer reviewed articles published globally as well as their OA availability. In this project they will renew and further develop the study as well as carry out a regional study of the Nordic countries. The Nordic part of the study will answer the following questions: * What share of scientific articles published in the Nordic countries is available open access? * What portion of the output of Nordic scholars is available as open access? * The project will also construct a list of the between 500-1000 scholary journals that are published in the Nordic countries and check their total article output as well as which part is available open access. The project can also see what kind of impact the establishment of institutional repositories in the Nordic countries has on the open access availabelity of Nordic scholary output. The target results of the project is a precise measure of how large a share of the overall volume of scientific journal litterature is available openly. By repeating a study from 2008 it will be possible to see trends concerning a possible increase in OA. The results concerning the Nordic journals and their open access availability would be interesting information for all participants in the OA discussion. Hanken and Lund university library are commited to repeating the study in 2011.
by sennoma 2009-07-21 00:37 oa.numbers · bochristerbjoerk
http://www.nordbib.net/Projects/OA-barometer-2009.aspx - cached - mail it - history
This is the hearing where Zerhouni estimated the NIH support for publication charges at 80 to 100 million/year
by sennoma 2009-07-13 14:08 oa.money · oa.numbers · oa.mandates
http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/hear_080911_1.html - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2009-07-06 05:13 oa.numbers · oa.money · publishing.models · oa.hybrid · thomasjwalker
http://entomology.ifas.ufl.edu/walker/epubi.htm - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2009-07-06 05:13 oa.numbers · oa.money · publishing.models · oa.hybrid · thomasjwalker
http://entomology.ifas.ufl.edu/walker/esaepub.htm - cached - mail it - history
Connecting Readers with Open Access Resources: The CUFTS Free! Open Access Collections Group Building a Digital Library with Learning Materials Creation of an International Digital Library of Manuscripts: seamless access to data from heterogeneous resources (ENRICH Project) Exploring the costs and benefits of alternative publishing models A Journal on the Web: What We Are Not, What We Do Not Want Understanding how Students and Faculty REALLY use E-Books: The UK National E-Books Observatory A publishing system to extract and represent the knowledge content of scientific articles on Health Science in machine-processable format Self-Archiving in practice: What do the researchers say and is there any pain alleviation? Scoping Study on Issues Relating to Quality-Control Measures within the Scholarly Communication Process Overlay Publications: a functional overview of the concept The PROBADO-Framework: Content-Based Queries for non-textual Documents PEER: Publishing and the Ecology of European Research PLoS One: background, future development, and article-level metrics Targeted knowledge: interaction and rich user experience towards a scholarly communication that “lets” Economic sustainability during transition: the case of scholarly publishing Automated Support for a Collaborative System to Organize a Collection using Facets Experimenting with the Trial of a Research Data Audit: Some Preliminary Findings about Data Types, Access to Data and Factors for Long Term Preservation Scientific publications on Web 3.0 Integrating Online Publications and Scholarly Discourse in the Context of Digital Libraries Incorporating Semantics and Metadata as Part of the Article Authoring Process Metadata Usage Tendencies in Latin American Electronic Journals Building a Semantic Digital Library for the Municipality of Milan Rethinking Critical Editions of Fragmentary Texts by Ontologies Bibliometric factor maps for knowledge discovery in digital libraries Digital Futures:
by sennoma 2009-06-30 13:06 oa · oa.money · oa.numbers
http://conferences.aepic.it/index.php/elpub/elpub2009/schedConf/presentations - cached - mail it - history
slide 17 has good graph of data deluge
by sennoma 2009-06-28 12:36 oa.numbers · oaos.talks · ericmeyer
http://www.slideshare.net/etmeyer/ethox-open-access-and-sci-practice - cached - mail it - history
More good comparisons for the CPI/journal prices graph -- idea from UCOSC via Sukhdev Singh slideshare
by sennoma 2009-06-28 12:30 statistics · oa.numbers
http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind08 - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2009-06-13 22:29 plos · scientometrics · oa.numbers
http://www.plosone.org/static/review.action;jsessionid=DBA8CC58C023F888CFF0F0D1FBD203F0 - cached - mail it - history
I've bookmarked both reports, this is just to remind me to actually read them: "The JISC ‘Economic implications of alternative scholarly publishing models’ and the RIN ‘Activities, costs and funding flows in the scholarly communications system in the UK’ both set out to identify opportunities arising from the shifts towards online publishing and various open access business models."
by sennoma 2009-06-02 22:39 oa.money · oa.numbers · publishing.models · readthis
http://www.ganesha-associates.com/blog/2009/06/some-thoughts-on-open-access-publishing.html - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2009-06-02 19:49 oa.mandates · oa.numbers · pauladavey · oaos.talks
http://www.slideshare.net/Pauladavey/as-a-result-of-the-mandates-1516440 - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2009-03-14 22:58 oa.money · oa.numbers
http://www.ala.org/ala/aboutala/offices/library/libraryfactsheet/alalibraryfact.cfm - cached - mail it - history
Major new report on the economic implications of OA
by sennoma 2009-02-02 00:43 oa.numbers · oa.money
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2009/01/major-new-report-on-economic.html - cached - mail it - history
From the Wiley Annual Report 2008 - To Our Shareholders: Fiscal year 2008 was a transformative year, as reflected in Wiley’s record results. Revenue increased 36% over the previous year to $1.7 billion, up from $1 billion just two years ago.
by sennoma 2009-02-02 00:42 oa.numbers · publishing.models
http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com/2009/01/wiley-revenues-increase-36-in-2008.html - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2009-01-24 00:24 oa.numbers
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2009/01/update-on-oa-percentage-of-new-articles.html - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2009-01-23 12:25 oa.numbers · collaboration · oaos.examples
http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/whowriteswikipedia - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2009-01-15 23:51 oa · oa.numbers
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2605039 - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2009-01-10 15:02 oa.numbers · oa.money
http://www.oecd.org/document/2/0,2340,en_2649_201185_34100162_1_1_1_1,00.html - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2009-01-10 14:12 oa.money · oa.numbers
http://www.ascb.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=195&Itemid=283 - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2008-12-20 22:23 oa.money · oa.numbers · serialscrisis
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6547086.html?rssid=220 - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2008-12-20 20:52 oa.money · oa.numbers · publishing · publishing.models
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/subscriptionpricelist.cws_home/2009subscrippricelistlibr/description - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2008-12-20 19:10 publishing.models · publishing · serialscrisis · oa.numbers
http://southernlibrarianship.icaap.org/content/v09n03/mcguigan_g01.html - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2008-12-20 19:10 oa.numbers · oa.citationadvantage
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/120748494/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0 - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2008-12-17 15:19 serialscrisis · oa.money · oa.numbers
http://treethinkers.blogspot.com/2008/12/academic-publishing-where-cost-has.html - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2008-12-15 00:29 oa.money · oa.numbers
http://rafaelsidi.blogspot.com/2008/12/finally-roi-calculation-for-investing.html - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2008-12-05 03:08 serialscrisis · oa.money · oa.numbers
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2008/12/serials-prices-still-going-up-6.html - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2008-11-15 16:54 oa.money · oa.numbers
http://www.rin.ac.uk/costs-funding-flows - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2008-10-21 22:18 publishing.models · oa.money · oa.numbers
http://www.gavinbaker.com/2008/10/16/submission-fees-a-means-of-defraying-costs-for-oa-journals/ - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2008-07-13 13:47 oa.numbers
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2008/07/effect-of-online-access-on-researcher.html - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2008-07-13 13:43 oa.numbers
http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/2008/07/09/academic-libraries-2006-first-look-released/ - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2008-06-11 12:27 oa.numbers · richardpoynder
http://poynder.blogspot.com/2008/06/open-access-doing-numbers.html - cached - mail it - history
The OAK Law Project has released the results of its 2007 nation-wide survey of the attitudes and practices of Australian academic authors towards the publication and dissemination of their research in its report, Academic authorship, publishing agreements and open access: Survey Results. The survey obtained evidence of author’s experiences with publishing agreements, their perceptions of open access and commercial publishing, their understanding of copyright ownership in their research and their involvement with online repositories and open access journals. It is envisaged that the results will be used to enhance the strategic management of copyright in the Australian research sector, especially in relation to open access. The report can be downloaded from the Queensland University of Technology’s ePrints (Open-access archive of QUT research literature).
by sennoma 2008-06-11 03:10 oa · oa.numbers
http://www.oaklaw.qut.edu.au/node/44 - cached - mail it - history
What is the OA percentage of new articles? Bo-Christer Björk, Annikki Roos, and Mari Lauri, Global annual volume of peer reviewed scholarly articles and the share available via different Open Access options, preprint of a paper to be presented at ElPub 2008, Open Scholarship: Authority, Community and Sustainability in the Age of Web 2.0 (Toronto, June 25-27, 2008). Abstract: A key parameter in any discussions about the academic peer reviewed journal system is the number of articles annually published. Several diverging estimates of this parameter have been proposed in the past, and have also influenced calculations of the average production price per article, the total costs of the journal system and the prevalence of Open Access publishing. With journals and articles increasingly being present on the web and indexed in a number of databases it has now become possible to quite accurately estimate the number of articles. We used the databases of ISI and Ulrich’s as our primary sources and estimate that the total number of articles published in 2006 by 23 750 journals was approximately 1 350 000. Using this number as denominator it was also possible to estimate the number of articles which are openly available on the web in primary OA journals (gold OA). This share turned out to be 4.6 % for the year 2006. In addition at least a further 3.5 % was available after an embargo period of usually one year, bringing the total share of gold OA to 8.1% Using a random sample of articles, we also tried to estimate the proportion of the articles published which are available as copies deposited in e-print repositories or homepages (green OA). Based on the article title a web search engine was used to search for a freely downloadable full-text version. For 11.3 % a usable copy was found. Combining these two figures we estimate that 19.4 % of the total yearly output can be accessed freely.
by sennoma 2008-04-19 21:42 oa.numbers
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2008/04/what-is-oa-percentage-of-new-articles.html - cached - mail it - history
Abstract Many proponents of open access to journal articles online view costs of publication as an essential yet minor component of the cost of conducting research in the life sciences. Author-side charges for publication in open-access journals in those fields should, therefore, be paid principally by the agencies and foundations that fund research. Recent analyses of the potential cost-to-institution of a widespread transition away from purchasing subscriptions to scholarly journals and towards paying open-access publication fees on behalf of affiliated faculty must be amended to reflect the reality that third-party funding agencies already pay the bulk of such fees in the life sciences, and will likely continue to do so.
by sennoma 2008-02-18 03:58 oa.money · oa.numbers
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6W63-4G54HPW-4&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&vie... - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2008-02-08 22:12 oa.numbers
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2008/02/australian-review-of-publisher-oa.html - cached - mail it - history
The digital era is having substantial impacts on journal publishing. In order to assist in analysing these impacts, a model is developed of the costs incurred in operating a refereed journal. Published information and estimates are used to apply the model to a computation of the total costs and per-article costs of various forms of journal-publishing. Particular attention is paid to the differences between print and electronic forms of journals, to the various forms of open access, and to the differences between not-for-profit and for-profit publishing undertakings. Insight is provided into why for-profit publishing is considerably more expensive than equivalent activities undertaken by unincorporated mutuals and not-for-profit associations. Conclusions are drawn concerning the current debates among conventional approaches and the various open alternatives. via: http://info-research.blogspot.com/2008/01/journal-economics.html
by sennoma 2008-01-01 18:51 oa · oa.numbers · oa.money
http://www.anu.edu.au/people/Roger.Clarke/EC/JP-CP.html - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2007-12-10 02:19 oa · oa.money · oa.numbers
http://blogs.openaccesscentral.com/blogs/bmcblog/entry/200702201 - cached - mail it - history
by sennoma 2007-09-26 20:59 oa · oa.numbers
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-05-022.html - cached - mail it - history
Suber: This is an excellent picture of where OA stands today. If you have colleagues who want to know what's been happening and only have time for one article, give them this URL.
by sennoma 2007-04-17 20:20 oa · serialscrisis · oa.money · oa.numbers
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6431958.html - cached - mail it - history
1 - 47 of 47  
Related Tags
 
- exclude ~ optional + require
Add Dates