The term “social money” suggests that some money, such as the form we are familiar with, is not social, even anti-social. With Mauss, I consider that money’s principal function, like that of the gift, is the extension of society, just as Simmel saw society’s potential for universality reflected in money.
by
robdyke
2007-10-13 11:30
economics
·
money
·
blog
http://www.thememorybank.co.uk/2007/10/09/money-is-always-social-global-and-virtual/
-
cached
-
mail it
-
history
simpy
