The structure of 2006's WSOP ME was "steeper" than that of 2005. But most are worse off - "Even more ridiculous is if you finish between 82-90, in 2005 you win $92k but in 2006 you win only $52k, WTF??" So why are they doing this? Some say it is to keep increasing the size of first prize, and to keep attracting the thousands of internet qualified amateurs, looking for the *big* win. What does everyone else think?
by
pokerbarney
2006-09-04 09:37
poker
·
wsop
·
wsop me
·
main event
·
holdem
·
tournament
·
chips
·
winning
·
payout structure
http://www.allinpokerblog.co.uk/04092006-Are_the_WSOP_ME_payouts_fair.php
-
cached
-
mail it
-
history