Well, this is a tricky case. It sounds like what he is doing is taunging, and testing patience of Singaporean law enforcement. What is his point? He just wanted to ask for the kind of freedom to tolerate what he does? Or does he want to highlight some of the unreasonably stringent restrictions on freedom of speech in Singapore? How much of this is a matter of cultural diversity and how much of it a fundamental, universal human right?
If I remember correctly, cursing the U.S. president is an offence under the U.S. law.
by
infosoc
2008-06-23 10:25
blog
·
lawsuit
http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2008/us-blogger-facing-criminal-libel-charges-singapore
-
cached
-
mail it
-
history
simpy
