pokerbarney's Feed

How The US Gambling Ban Affects Players

pokerbarney — Fri, 06 Oct 2006 03:16:00 -0400

Like it or not, it happened. And, by the way America, we don't like it. Not one little bit. Law can get confusing, but I hope I made the bill and it's effects clear in this post. Tagged by pokerbarney under poker, hold'em, holdem, tournament, sng, chips, winning, gambling, gamble, hand history, replayer, card game, harrington, wsop, ban, law, act, bill,

5 Ultimate Online Tools Every Poker Player Needs

pokerbarney — Wed, 04 Oct 2006 11:05:00 -0400

Can't find a decent game? Keep getting beaten by unknown players? Generally wish you were in profit for the month? These sites will answer all 3 questions! Well.. not the last one, but certainly the first two. Here fishy fishy fishy fishy... Tagged by pokerbarney under poker, hold'em, holdem, tournament, sng, chips, winning, gambling, gamble, hand history, replayer, card game, harrington, wsop, player tracking, statistics,

Top 5 Poker Fashion Accessories

pokerbarney — Mon, 02 Oct 2006 07:17:00 -0400

Do you look good at the table? As good as the pros? Or do you look like a strategically shaved baboon in a penguin suit? Not any more! Tagged by pokerbarney under poker, hold'em, holdem, tournament, sng, chips, winning, gambling, gamble, hand history, replayer, card game, harrington, wsop, fashion, table gear,

WSOP 2006 Controversy - Appearing Chips And Vanishing Millions.

pokerbarney — Sun, 01 Oct 2006 05:53:00 -0400

The 2006 WSOP had the largest cash prize pool ever, but was filled with controversy. Mysterious appearing chips and now a guy claiming half Jamie Gold's winnings. Whatever next? Tagged by pokerbarney under poker, hold'em, holdem, tournament, sng, chips, winning, gambling, gamble, hand history, replayer, card game, harrington, wsop, me, jamie gold, harrahs,

Are the WSOP ME payouts fair?

pokerbarney — Mon, 04 Sep 2006 09:37:00 -0400

The structure of 2006's WSOP ME was "steeper" than that of 2005. But most are worse off - "Even more ridiculous is if you finish between 82-90, in 2005 you win $92k but in 2006 you win only $52k, WTF??" So why are they doing this? Some say it is to keep increasing the size of first prize, and to keep attracting the thousands of internet qualified amateurs, looking for the *big* win. What does everyone else think? Tagged by pokerbarney under poker, wsop, wsop me, main event, holdem, tournament, chips, winning, payout structure,